O
Fort Smith
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Goodwin & Goodwin bid rejection

Fort Smith

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (3)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
4

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedEric LynnOct 20, 2026

Representing Goodwin & Goodwin, argued the engineer's estimate lowballed trench safety costs and noted the city has repeatedly awarded single-bid contracts — including five on consent decree work.

Board of Directors - Regular Meeting - Oct 20, 2026 · 1:02:46 →
ConcernedJason SkarbitzOct 20, 2026

Asked why other contractors didn't bid, what a delay would cost, whether the work could be repackaged, and whether the engineering estimate is realistic.

Board of Directors - Regular Meeting - Oct 20, 2026 · 1:05:08 →
OpposedCrystal CadelliOct 20, 2026

Urged rejection so the project can be properly advertised on free platforms like Dodge Construction Network and Construct Connect to attract more bidders, saving potentially $92,000 per 2%.

Board of Directors - Regular Meeting - Oct 20, 2026 · 1:07:01 →
OpposedTodd LewisOct 20, 2026

The bidder's attorney argued no state law or city ordinance permits rejecting a bid solely because it's single, cited past awards far above estimates, and threatened an injunction if the city violates its own rules.

Board of Directors - Regular Meeting - Oct 20, 2026 · 1:09:31 →